Trial reportWorld journal of urology2026
Integrating NCCN and LATITUDE in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a TITAN analysis.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02489318 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of Apalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of Apalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Versus ADT in Subjects With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate whether an integrated classification combining the CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria improves prognostic stratification and to explore treatment effects across risk groups, including further stratification by metastasis timing, in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This post hoc analysis included 1,052 patients from the TITAN trial (NCT02489318) randomized to receive apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or placebo plus ADT. Patients were classified into double low, intermediate, and double high groups based on the CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria and further stratified by metastasis timing. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index). Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models, with baseline imbalances adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The integrated classification based on the CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria significantly improved prognostic stratification, yielding a higher C-index for OS (0.645) than the CHAARTED (0.628; p = 0.011) or LATITUDE (0.621; p = 0.003) criteria alone. When further stratified by metastasis timing, apalutamide was associated with improved OS across most subgroups; however, no clear benefit was observed in the double low group with synchronous metastasis (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.79; p = 0.8). Integrating the CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria significantly improves prognostic stratification in patients with mCSPC. While further stratification by metastasis timing suggested no clear survival benefit in the double low synchronous subgroup, wide CIs indicate substantial uncertainty. These exploratory findings require prospective validation.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02489318.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.