ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Multifocal necrotizing fasciitis: what makes it different? A German trauma center experience.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultifocal necrotizing fasciitis (MulNF) is a rare presentation of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) characterized by involvement of more than one non-contiguous anatomical site during the same disease episode. Comparative data between monofocal and multifocal NF remain limited.
methodsWe performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients treated for NF between 2015 and 2026. Patients were classified as MNF (single site) or MulNF (multiple non-contiguous sites) based on chart review. Demographics, comorbidities, microbiology, laboratory values, organ failure, ICU course, surgical burden, and outcomes were compared.
resultsForty-seven patients were included, of whom five (10.6%) had multifocal NF. Four of these showed clearly synchronous non-contiguous involvement, whereas one developed a delayed second non-contiguous focus within the first four days of the same disease episode. Compared with MNF, MulNF was associated with higher ICU burden, more frequent mechanical ventilation, and a greater number of debridements and total operations. Higher rates of septic shock, hemodynamic failure, and renal replacement therapy were observed in MulNF. No deaths occurred in the small multifocal cohort, whereas 11/42 patients with monofocal NF died during hospitalization. Given the small multifocal sample size and multiple comparisons performed, all findings should be interpreted cautiously.
conclusionIn this single-center cohort, multifocal NF represented a rare but clinically severe disease pattern associated with greater ICU and surgical burden than monofocal NF. These findings support heightened clinical vigilance for additional non-contiguous foci and emphasize the importance of rapid diagnosis and repeated surgical assessment. Larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these exploratory observations and better define the clinical relevance and pathogenesis of multifocal NF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.