Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616129›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026

External validation of a machine learning-based web application for personalized testing of objective functioning using the five-repetition sit-to-stand test.

Kenneth Arockia, Massimo Bottini, Anita M Klukowska, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Maria Gharios, Ali Buwaider, Carlo Serra, Luca Regli, Marc L Schröder, Victor E Staartjes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kenneth ArockiaMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Massimo BottiniMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-2646-0469
Anita M KlukowskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2990-8082
Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-761X
Maria GhariosDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3614-8782
Ali BuwaiderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0000-1966-7911
Carlo SerraMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-550X
Luca RegliMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-4474
Marc L SchröderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. victoregon.staartjes@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-2098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSimple generalized thresholds for assessing functional impairment in clinical testing are limited, as they fail to consider patient-specific properties such as age, body height, and body mass index. A previously developed machine learning-based model for personalized testing using the five-repetition sit-to-stand (5R-STS) test, that estimates personalized upper limits of normal (ULN) to identify objective functional impairment (OFI) was externally validated to evaluate its performance and generalizability across cohorts.

methodsOnly healthy individuals were included in the study. After the machine learning-based model was applied to this external dataset, expected and observed 5R-STS test times were compared using standardized performance assessment metrics including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and R

resultsApplication of the model to 171 healthy individuals resulted in an RMSE of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.93 to 2.73) seconds, MAE of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.47 to 1.94) seconds, and R

conclusionsIn the context of personalized testing, moving toward individually focused precision assessment of patients requires rigorous external validation to ensure the robustness of such applied computational methods. In this external validation, the model demonstrated limited generalization including a systematic underestimation of slower test times and insufficient personalized ULN calibration. These findings indicate that external validity of models derived from single-center data can be limited, underscoring the importance of comprehensive external validation and, potentially, multicenter retraining before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Exercise TestInternetMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultExternal validationFive-repetition sit-to-stand testMachine learningObjective functional testingPersonalized medicinePrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42616129
PMCPMC13490198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.