ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Focus on Albumin: new perspectives for the clinical application in intensive care medicine : From the quantitative routine to qualitative individualized theranostics].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human albumin plays a double role in intensive care medicine. It is therapeutically administered as a colloid and diagnostically employed as a laboratory parameter for risk and monitoring classification. For both fields of application, a quantitative logic has so far been dominant. Large randomized studies consistently show that human albumin is overall safer than crystalloids but does not provide a general benefit in most intensive care medical scenarios. Subgroup-specific risks must be considered: in cases of traumatic brain injuries the administration of hypotonic 4% albumin solution was associated with an increased mortality; new analyses indicate that the hypotonicity of the solution in particular and not the albumin molecule per se was the decisive risk factor. A target value-based albumin strategy also does not lead to any advantage with respect to mortality in cases of sepsis. Accordingly, current guidelines and international consensus recommendations position albumin as a targeted supplement after administration of crystalloids and not as first-line treatment.Parallel to the established evidence, the interest in a qualitative albumin perspective is growing. In cases of sepsis and septic shock albumin is not only quantitatively reduced but its function as transport and binding protein can also be measurably impaired. The term theranostics can be understood as an integrated approach in which a functional assay captures the individual albumin phenotype from which a phenotype-specific intervention can be derived and the success of treatment can be monitored based on the same parameters. Practical examples, from altered pharmacokinetics of furosemide in cases of reduced binding capacity to the differentiated assessment of albumin formulations in cases of brain injury, illustrate the concept. Taken as a whole, the available evidence indicates a paradigm shift away from the purely quantitative consideration to functional phenotype-based albumin theranostics, where the clinical benefits must be confirmed in prospective multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.