ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
How does European mental health legislation promote autonomy for those in involuntary care? A comparative descriptive analysis of 27 countries.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA growing emphasis on autonomy, manifest through the influence of recovery orientations, user involvement, and the broader shift towards patient-centered healthcare, has significantly influenced mental health care. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is a pivotal development in this regard, challenging longstanding practices in mental health care and particularly involuntary care. This study examined how European mental health legislation seeks to promote the autonomy of those subjected to involuntary care, by analyzing laws from 27 jurisdictions.
methodsData was collected via a comprehensive survey between July 2023 and September 2024, completed by country representatives from the EU COST Action FOSTREN network. We examined the letter of the law as regards 16 autonomy-promoting provisions including the principle of least restriction, capacity-based criteria, supported decision-making, advance healthcare directives, treatment plans, rights to appeal, legal aid, advocacy services, and oversight mechanisms.
resultsMost laws across the 27 jurisdictions were amended in the last eight years. All legislations included at least one measure related to the principle of least restriction, the right to appeal against involuntary status, and support to do so, such as legal aid. In contrast, mechanisms designed to support autonomous decision-making, such as Advance Healthcare Directives and Supported Decision-Making, were less frequently included as a right.
conclusionWhile procedural legal safeguards are well established, there is significant variation in the adoption of other legal mechanisms to afford statutory rights to individuals in line with autonomy promoting approaches, including the CRPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.