ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Endoscopic diagnostics and treatment of early neoplasia of the esophagus].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic diagnostics and treatment of early esophageal neoplasia have achieved considerable progress in recent years. For Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are available, followed by ablation of residual Barrett's epithelium to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. The use of ESD is becoming increasingly more important due to higher en bloc and R0 resection rates and enables precise histopathological diagnostics. For squamous cell neoplasia ESD is the preferred resection technique. After noncurative resection, additional surgical treatment or chemoradiotherapy is recommended; however, emerging data suggest that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy could represent an oncologically equivalent alternative to esophageal resection in selected patients. Current research priorities include optimizing endoscopic screening, including non-endoscopic pretests and artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis as well as the extension of organ-preserving treatment concepts through adjuvant treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.