ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026
Call for Ethical Guidelines in Cosmetic Dermatology for Adolescents.
Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of appearance-enhancing dermatology procedures among adolescents has increased markedly, raising ethical concerns regarding body image, developmental suitability, and psychosocial risk. Individuals 19 and under experienced a 75% increase in neuromodulator injections and a 71% increase in hyaluronic acid fillers between 2019 and 2022. Social and commercial forces-including social media and targeted marketing-promote cosmetic intervention as routine self-optimization, despite adolescents' ongoing cognitive, emotional, and identity development. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe focus on elective, nonmedically necessary procedures such as neuromodulators and fillers in individuals aged 13-19. We review ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice), psychosocial vulnerabilities (including body dysmorphic disorder [BDD]), social media influence, commercial pressures, and longitudinal mental health outcomes. Current regulatory guidance and professional society recommendations are assessed for gaps.
resultsAdolescents' emerging autonomy is developmentally incomplete, and appearance-based motivations are often transient and externally influenced. Longitudinal data link cosmetic procedures with higher depression, anxiety, and lower self-esteem. BDD affects ∼2% of adolescents, who rarely improve after intervention and may worsen. Social media exposure doubles the likelihood of considering cosmetic procedures, and commercial marketing further normalizes aesthetic ideals. Existing professional guidelines rarely mandate validated psychosocial screening, structured counseling, or cooling-off periods, leaving adolescents vulnerable to premature intervention.
conclusionA standardized, multi-component ethical framework is necessary to guide clinicians caring for adolescents seeking elective aesthetic procedures. Recommendations include medical-necessity assessment, structured counseling, strengthened parental consent, validated BDD screening, and careful documentation with follow-up. Clear, evidence-informed ethical standards are essential to safeguard adolescent well-being and prioritize patient welfare over commercial interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.