Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615796›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

The neural processes of illusory occlusion in object recognition.

Almudena Ramírez-Haro, Denise Moerel, Genevieve L Quek, Manuel Varlet, Tijl Grootswagers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Almudena Ramírez-HaroThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Denise MoerelThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Genevieve L QuekThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Manuel VarletThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Tijl GrootswagersThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast and accurate object recognition is crucial for effective behavior in dynamic visual environments. In some cases, the visual system must overcome ambiguity in visual input during object recognition, such as when an object is partially hidden behind another. Recurrent processing between higher- and lower-order areas is thought to play a role in resolving such ambiguity, enabling the filling in of missing visual information. Here we examined this claim using a novel paradigm in which partial object images appear "occluded" by an illusory Kanizsa figure, perception of which also depends on recurrent processing by the grouping of Pacmen inducers. If both recognizing the partial object and perceiving the illusory shape depend on recurrent processing, object recognition should vary as a function of the presence of illusory shape. Across two behavioral experiments and a separate electroencephalography decoding study, we found no evidence of an interaction between illusion perception and object recognition, as well as different neural time courses for the illusory figures alone compared with partial objects, which were decoded earlier. Ultimately, our study highlights the robustness of the visual system to solve the identity of the ambiguous object, independently of the processing of different ambiguities occurring at the same time, providing new insights into the mechanisms of recurrence in the early and late stages of information processing and its application to ambiguous object recognition.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionIllusionsOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42615796
PMCPMC13505799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.