ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2026
Trends in mortality and disease burden from diabetes mellitus in Argentina between 1990 and 2022.
Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to analyze the trends in mortality and disease burden due to Diabetes Mellitus in Argentina from 1990 to 2022.
methodsA longitudinal descriptive time-series study was conducted. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) and age-adjusted potential years of life lost (AAYPLL) were calculated. Trend analysis was performed using segmented regression (Joinpoint).
resultsBetween 1990 and 2022, a total of 270,394 deaths from diabetes mellitus were recorded in Argentina, of which 52.1% occurred among men and 48.8% among women. ASMRs and AAYPLL analyses consistently showed higher values among men than among women. The average annual percent change (AAPC) for both ASMRs and AAYPLL indicated a plateau among men and a significant decrease among women.
conclusionThe findings suggest a slight trend toward a decrease in the age at death among men, whereas the opposite pattern was observed among women. These findings have important implications for public health and policymaking. The high number of DM-related deaths among older age groups underscores the need for healthcare services tailored to the aging population. Furthermore, gender differences in mortality, with women tending to die at older ages than men, suggest that healthcare strategies should address gender-specific needs and risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.