ArticleCoDAS2026
Rapid syllable transition treatment (ReST) in children with speech motor delay: case studies.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech Motor Delay (SMD) is characterized by difficulties in motor execution, resulting in unintelligible speech, with changes in articulatory precision, stability, voice, and prosody, as well as reduced articulatory dissociation and excessive movements for age. The objective of this study was to describe, through four longitudinal case studies, the performance of Brazilian children with SMD submitted to the Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST), verifying acquisition, retention, and generalization. Four monolingual children, aged five to eight years and diagnosed with SMD, participated. The intervention was conducted via synchronous telepractice, twice a week, over six weeks. Probes of trained and untrained pseudowords, sentences, real words, and control items were applied at different stages of therapy. The results showed progressive improvement in all evaluated aspects. Significant gains were observed in phoneme accuracy, lexical stress, and coarticulation, confirming acquisition, retention, and generalization. It is concluded that ReST is effective for children with SMD, including when applied through telepractice, representing a promising evidence-based therapeutic alternative grounded in motor learning principles and supported by linguistically controlled stimuli selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.