ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Bromodomain dimers: A case study of BRD4 and family-wide AlphaFold predictions.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AlphaFold has enabled large-scale prediction of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid complexes, but ranking and assessing the quality of predicted models remain challenging. Existing confidence scores are often highly parametrized and provide limited interpretability. We introduce a simple geometric framework that converts AlphaFold-predicted aligned error (PAE) into conditional contact probability. We show that these probabilities are well calibrated to the fraction of native contacts observed across experimentally determined structures. Motivated by this, we define the Pinc score (Probability of interface native contacts) as the mean contact probability between interacting chains. Because the probabilistic interpretation extends to individual residues, Pinc captures local structural constraint beyond interfacial burial, enabling residue-level prioritization of hotspot positions for mutational studies. Depending solely on a single empirically fixed contact radius, Pinc offers an interpretable path from PAE to interface confidence, matching or exceeding the classification performance of more complex methods across five independent benchmark sets. We provide a portable, dependency-free C program and a Google Colab notebook for calculating Pinc scores for AlphaFold models at https://git.mpi-cbg.de/tothpetroczylab/Pinc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.