Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615564›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026

A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.

Mihaly Badonyi, Agnes Toth-Petroczy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mihaly BadonyiMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Agnes Toth-PetroczyMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0333-604X

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AlphaFold has enabled large-scale prediction of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid complexes, but ranking and assessing the quality of predicted models remain challenging. Existing confidence scores are often highly parametrized and provide limited interpretability. We introduce a simple geometric framework that converts AlphaFold-predicted aligned error (PAE) into conditional contact probability. We show that these probabilities are well calibrated to the fraction of native contacts observed across experimentally determined structures. Motivated by this, we define the Pinc score (Probability of interface native contacts) as the mean contact probability between interacting chains. Because the probabilistic interpretation extends to individual residues, Pinc captures local structural constraint beyond interfacial burial, enabling residue-level prioritization of hotspot positions for mutational studies. Depending solely on a single empirically fixed contact radius, Pinc offers an interpretable path from PAE to interface confidence, matching or exceeding the classification performance of more complex methods across five independent benchmark sets. We provide a portable, dependency-free C program and a Google Colab notebook for calculating Pinc scores for AlphaFold models at https://git.mpi-cbg.de/tothpetroczylab/Pinc.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsSoftwareModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsalphafoldcomputational biologyprotein complexesprotein–DNA interactionprotein–protein interaction predictionprotein structure modelingsoftware

Identifiers

PMID42615564
PMCPMC13488364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.