Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615553›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2026

Beyond Binary: Cardiac Patterning as Probabilistic Fate Restriction.

Kenzo Ivanovitch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenzo IvanovitchDevelopmental Biology of Birth Defects, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council APP66400British Heart Foundation FS/IBSRF/21/25085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian heart is classically described as arising from two cardiac lineages, first and second. Yet, recent lineage tracing of Mesp1 mesoderm and live imaging show that cardiac progenitors are already partly biased toward specific heart regions during gastrulation, despite extensive cell mixing. We propose that cardiac fate is probabilistic, analogous to stochastic fate strategies in the retina. Epiblast cells carry probability distributions over fates that resolve during gastrulation into specific regional allocations. Reanalyzing a retrospective clonal dataset, we find that the clones do not single out one fixed lineage tree. Instead, the data permit a family of 361 distinct restriction topologies, none dominant, and only 40 of these are binary. Among the binary trees, the best-supported recover both where progenitors sit along the proximal-distal axis of the streak and the order in which they leave it, as recent prospective lineage tracing shows. Rather than replacing the first/second lineage concept, this framework shifts the focus from fixed lineage identity to fate probabilities. Testing this idea will require prospective live imaging from epiblast through heart tube formation.

Indexed as

Cell LineageHeartAnimalsBody PatterningCell DifferentiationGastrulationGerm LayersMesodermMyocardiumcardiac progenitorscell fate determinationembryonic heartepiblastfate mappinggastrulationlineage tracinglive cell imagingmesodermprimitive streak

Identifiers

PMID42615553
PMCPMC13488265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.