ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2026
Beyond Binary: Cardiac Patterning as Probabilistic Fate Restriction.
Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The mammalian heart is classically described as arising from two cardiac lineages, first and second. Yet, recent lineage tracing of Mesp1 mesoderm and live imaging show that cardiac progenitors are already partly biased toward specific heart regions during gastrulation, despite extensive cell mixing. We propose that cardiac fate is probabilistic, analogous to stochastic fate strategies in the retina. Epiblast cells carry probability distributions over fates that resolve during gastrulation into specific regional allocations. Reanalyzing a retrospective clonal dataset, we find that the clones do not single out one fixed lineage tree. Instead, the data permit a family of 361 distinct restriction topologies, none dominant, and only 40 of these are binary. Among the binary trees, the best-supported recover both where progenitors sit along the proximal-distal axis of the streak and the order in which they leave it, as recent prospective lineage tracing shows. Rather than replacing the first/second lineage concept, this framework shifts the focus from fixed lineage identity to fate probabilities. Testing this idea will require prospective live imaging from epiblast through heart tube formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.