ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Deep learning-enhanced detection of dental restorations and orthodontic appliances in panoramic radiographs using a clinically annotated dataset.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveManual interpretation of dental panoramic radiographs is labor intensive and prone to diagnostic fatigue, particularly in high-volume settings. While artificial intelligence offers potential solutions, existing automated detection models often suffer from limited generalization due to small-scale, inconsistent datasets and scale mismatches between generic algorithms and dental structures. This study aimed to develop a deep learning framework trained on a clinically annotated retrospective dataset to improve the multiclass detection accuracy of dental restorations and appliances. MATERIAL AND
methodA retrospective dataset comprising 2,434 anonymized panoramic X-ray images was curated and annotated by trained dental professionals for six categories: crowns, root canal filling, fillings, bridges, implants, and braces. The baseline dataset used for contextual comparison had a different annotation scope and class composition from the enhanced dataset; therefore, it was used only as a descriptive reference rather than as a directly matched comparator. A faster Region based Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN) model with a ResNet-50 Feature Pyramid Network backbone was trained using domain-specific optimizations, including customized anchor resizing (16-256 pixels) and adaptive data augmentation.
findingsThe enhanced dataset setting achieved an mAP@0.5 of 0.75, which was numerically higher than the baseline setting but should not be interpreted as a directly controlled improvement because the datasets differed in source and annotation scope. The system demonstrated significant gains in detecting small targets, with average recall increasing from 0.59 to 0.81. Performance varied by category; implants achieved the highest precision at 0.93, while braces exhibited lower precision at 0.32 due to overlapping artifacts. The average processing time was under 1.2 s per image on the tested laptop workstation.
conclusionThese findings suggest that clinically curated data and domain-adaptive design may improve detection performance in panoramic radiography. The framework may have potential as a decision-support tool, but further external and multicenter validation is needed before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.