ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
A (Political) Battle of the Sexes: Gender Polarization on Gender-Related Attitudes Across 14 Societies.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although it is well-established that women typically endorse more progressive gender-related attitudes compared to men, key questions remain about the magnitude of this gender difference and whether it systematically varies in relation to levels of gender inequality across societies. In the current research, we aim to address these questions by examining endorsement of traditional (overt) and modern (indirect) forms of sexism across 14 countries, including those with relatively low levels of gender equality (e.g., Saudi Arabia, India, and Egypt) and those with relatively high equality (e.g., Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Results show that endorsement of old-fashioned sexism is inversely related to country-level gender equality for women and men, whereas modern sexism endorsement is inversely related to gender equality for women, but not men. Thus, gender polarization is largest on modern sexist attitudes in relatively high gender-equal countries, and this is because in such contexts modern forms of sexism are especially likely to be rejected by women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.