ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Pilot Testing of the WHO Basic Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (Basic PIR): Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility Among Primary Care Workers in China, Tajikistan, and Tanzania.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionRehabilitation is essential for Universal Health Coverage, yet access remains limited in low- and middle-income countries. The WHO developed the Basic Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (Basic PIR) to address this gap through task-sharing with primary care (PC) workers. This pilot study evaluated the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the Basic PIR clinical resource in China, Tajikistan, and Tanzania.MethodsA mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used, involving 53 PC workers. Quantitative data from Likert-scale questionnaires were followed by qualitative focus group discussions.ResultsHigh median scores (4-5) across all countries indicated strong initial implementation potential within the pilot cohorts. Participants found the resource's clear visuals and simple interventions superior to existing tools. Qualitatively, the tool fostered professional empowerment, particularly among nurses. However, barriers included time constraints, resource gaps, and cultural preferences for passive treatments over active exercises.DiscussionThe Basic PIR demonstrated high implementation potential across all the pilot sites. Tanzania and Tajikistan had a near-universal agreement on its acceptability and, appropriateness. Although China showed strong feasibility, the PC workers noted cultural preferences for passive treatments and minor challenges with the Basic PIR's design.ConclusionThe Basic PIR offers a potentially viable pathway for integrating rehabilitation into PC in these settings. Successful implementation requires addressing systemic barriers and adapting to local cultural contexts to ensure long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.