Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615252›Full record

Observational studyPaediatric anaesthesia2026

Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Induction Compliance Checklist in Children Undergoing Mask Anesthesia.

Yesim Andiran Senayli, Nida Kiyici, Sevgi Ulusoy Tangul, Cevdet Yardimci, Mehmet Kara, Atilla Senayli, Zeev N Kain

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yesim Andiran SenayliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-9187
Nida KiyiciDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-7554
Sevgi Ulusoy TangulDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-1504
Cevdet YardimciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-891X
Mehmet KaraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-8213
Atilla SenayliDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-8162
Zeev N KainDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1060-6600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children undergoing anesthesia commonly exhibit distress behaviors such as anxiety, crying, and physical resistance. Assessment of this behavior is important as it could lead to postoperative behavioral changes and delayed recovery.

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-observer reliability of the Turkish version of the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC), which was developed to assess compliance behaviors in children during anesthesia induction.

methodsThe study was planned as a prospective observational study. Following translation of the original ICC, content validity was examined using the Davis technique with the opinions of 10 experts. Next, Turkish ICC was applied simultaneously and independently by three independent observers during mask induction to 184 children (ASA I-III) aged 1-7 years undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Inter-observer reliability was evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss Kappa/Gwet's AC1; internal consistency with KR-20 and McDonald's omega; and construct validity with single-factor confirmatory factor analysis (WLSMV). Item analysis was performed with a tetrachoric correlation matrix, floor and ceiling effects.

resultsContent validity was excellent (I-CVI 0.90-1.00, S-CVI≈0.99). Inter-observer reliability for the total score was excellent: InCC (1, 2) = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94), InCC (2, 3) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). At the item level, Gwet's AC1 values ranged from 0.81 to 0.97, while Kappa values were generally 0.75-0.90 except for M11. Internal consistency was at an acceptable level with KR-20 0.49-0.52 and McDonald's omega 0.66-0.82. These results are low due to the floor effect caused by premedication. Confirmatory factor analysis moderately supported the single-factor structure (best fit in Observer Surgeon: CFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.907). High floor effect was prominent especially in rarely observed severe behaviors (M7-M11); strong correlation was observed between M9-M10 (0.89-0.94).

conclusionsFollowing rigorous analysis, we found that the Turkish ICC is a reliable and valid tool that can assess children's compliance behaviors during pediatric anesthesia induction. Excellent inter-observer agreement and high content validity support its suitability for clinical and research use. The Turkish Induction Compliance Checklist is a reliable and valid measurement tool in the Turkish pediatric population. It can contribute to standardized evaluation of child behaviors during anesthesia induction and help improve the quality of perioperative care.

Indexed as

ChecklistMasksPatient CompliancePediatric AnesthesiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleObserver VariationProspective StudiesPsychological DistressPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsTurkeybehavior observation techniqueschildgeneral anesthesiainhalation anesthesiapreoperative carepreschool childpsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID42615252
PMCPMC13639224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.