Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615249›Full record

SynthesisJournal of marital and family therapy2026

Multi-Family Therapy in East and Southeast Asia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Ouyang Hanlai, Sufang Peng, Jue Chen, See Heng Yim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of marital and family therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ouyang HanlaiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai, China.
Sufang PengShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai, China.
Jue ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9924-2573
See Heng YimDepartment of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-1017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review examined the characteristics, cultural adaptations, and effectiveness of multi-family therapy in studies conducted in the Chinese Mainland, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Eighteen reports from 17 studies were included, covering quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs. Quantitative findings showed that multi-family therapy was more consistently associated with improvements in individual-level outcomes (e.g., symptom severity, psychological distress, functioning), whereas effects on family-system outcomes were more mixed. Thematic synthesis of qualitative and mixed-methods studies identified four interrelated themes: multi-family therapy creates a non-problem-saturated space for families to come together; engages them in fun activities; fosters inter- and intra-family connection; and supports relational understanding. Overall, individual-level benefits are more readily captured by quantitative measures, while relational and process-level changes may be less well-reflected. Future research should strengthen methodological rigor and extend multi-family therapy to presenting problems, such as eating disorders, to better evaluate its family-system mechanisms and effects.

Indexed as

Family TherapyAsia, EasternAsia, SoutheasternHumansEast and Southeast Asiafamily therapymultifamily therapymultiple family therapysystematic reviewsystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID42615249
PMCPMC13487648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.