Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615125›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2026

Pulsed Field Ablation Therapy Parameters: Enhancing Lesion Depth While Reducing Musculoskeletal Stimulation and Thermal Response in an Irrigated Tip Catheter: A Comprehensive Study Using In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Models.

Atul Verma, Chirag Barbhaiya, Daniel J Friedman, Jonathan P Piccini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atul VermaMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada (A.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-1020-9727
Chirag BarbhaiyaNew York University Langone Health (C.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-3479-936X
Daniel J FriedmanDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (D.J.F., J.P.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-5791-1954
Jonathan P PicciniDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (D.J.F., J.P.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-0772-2404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulsed field ablation therapies need to be optimized to maximize lesion depth while mitigating heat and musculoskeletal stimulation. We describe the adjustment of biphasic pulsed field ablation parameters for an irrigated tip catheter.

methodsExperimental models all used an 8F, flexible-tip, irrigated ablation catheter. Computer simulation models were designed to assess the effects of bipolar versus monopolar applications. A vegetal (potato) model was used to assess the effects of voltage, pulse width, and number of pulses per burst on lesion depth. In-vitro testing on bovine cardiac muscle was performed with temperature sensors at the surface and 3 and 7 mm beneath the surface to measure temperature rises. Finally, an in vivo canine model was used to assess for musculoskeletal stimulation caused by the pulsed field ablation therapies established with the vegetal/in vitro testing.

resultsMonopolar delivery consistently delivered more tissue depth than bipolar configurations. Adjustments from n to n+1.0 µs and increasing pulses per burst from 50 to 250 increased lesion depth but also increased musculoskeletal stimulation. The optimized burst count was 5 R-wave-gated bursts over 4 to 9 seconds. The optimized therapy had a minimal observed depth of >5 mm and minimized musculoskeletal stimulation. Final selected therapies did create temperature rises, which were completely offset by irrigation rates of 7 to 13 mL/min.

conclusionsPulse width and number of pulses per burst are important contributors to lesion depth, musculoskeletal stimulation, and incident heating. Even small adjustments in these parameters can alter lesion depth, muscle stimulation, and thermal effects, which will differentiate optimal from suboptimal pulsed field ablation.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersCatheter AblationComputer SimulationTherapeutic IrrigationAnimalsCattleDogsEquipment DesignHot TemperatureIrreversible Electroporation TherapyModels, Animalanimalcathetercomputer simulationheatingtemperature

Identifiers

PMID42615125
PMCPMC13581297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.