ReviewThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2026
Metabolic Syndrome and Dementia Risk in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.
Review in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia is a major global health issue in aging societies. Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of metabolic abnormalities, has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor for dementia, although existing evidence remains inconsistent. This review examined recent studies on the association between MetS and dementia risk in older adults. We searched PubMed for original studies published between January 1, 2014, and July 15, 2024, using the keywords "metabolic syndrome" and "dementia." Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria: five retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies, four cross-sectional studies, two bioinformatics studies, and one meta-analysis. Overall, MetS was associated with adverse cognitive outcomes, with relatively more consistent evidence for vascular dementia and progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia than for Alzheimer disease. Hypertension, abdominal obesity, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with adverse cognitive outcomes in some studies, although component-specific findings varied across studies. Temporal patterns of MetS also appeared to be relevant, with some studies reporting higher dementia risk in individuals with worsening or persistent metabolic burden, although findings after MetS resolution were not consistent. Several studies also reported deficits in executive, attention, and visuospatial function. Bioinformatics studies suggested possible genetic links, including overlap with apolipoprotein E-related pathways, although evidence remains limited. MetS may represent a clinically relevant risk marker for adverse cognitive outcomes in older adults, although its association varies according to MetS definition, study population, and cognitive outcome. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms and subtype-specific associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.