ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Economic evaluation of population-level dementia prevention strategies in China: informing policy and public health action.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile it has been postulated that population-based strategies targeting modifiable dementia risk factors are cost effective in high-income settings, their health and economic impact in China remains unclear.
methodsA Markov model evaluated five interventions: salt substitution, smoke-free legislation, increased tobacco tax, sugar-sweetened beverage tax, and alcohol tax. Outcomes included dementia cases, deaths averted, life years gained, and lifetime cost-savings, assessed from a societal perspective over an infinite time horizon. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsAll interventions were assessed to be cost-saving. Salt substitution was modeled to have the greatest impact, resulting in 1,940,000 quality-adjusted life years gained and lifetime cost savings of US$65 to US$70 billion. Smoke-free policies and tobacco taxes also showed significant benefits. Beverage and alcohol taxes had smaller but meaningful effects. Males generally benefited more. DISCUSSION: We estimated that population-level interventions would reduce costs in China, with the largest gains from targeting hypertension and smoking. Prioritizing such strategies may generate substantial health gains while reducing long-term societal costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.