Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615088›Full record

ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2026

Dream processes and affect regulation in psychotherapy: a longitudinal clinical case study.

Dorottya Bíró, Péter Osváth, Mátyás Mészáros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorottya BíróAlbert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged.
Péter OsváthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs.
Mátyás MészárosDoctoral School of Clinical Neuroscience, Medical School, University of Pécs.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders frequently emerge in contexts of chronic interpersonal stress and are often accompanied by disturbances in affect regulation and heightened sensitivity to bodily signals. In patients with chronic somatic conditions, these processes are commonly conceptualised within psychosomatic frameworks emphasising interactions between emotional regulation and stress-related bodily systems. Although psychotherapy may facilitate psychological adaptation, less is known about how dream processes reflect ongoing changes in affect regulation during treatment. The present study explores longitudinal changes in dream narratives during psychotherapy in a patient with anxiety and depressive symptoms in the context of ulcerative colitis. A qualitative, process-oriented longitudinal case study was conducted within analytically oriented psychotherapy with a 28-year-old patient. Over one year, the patient recorded dreams, from which five clinically significant dreams were selected. Dream reports were analysed alongside psychotherapy process notes and in-session associations using thematic analysis, informed by Jungian amplification. Three thematic constellations were identified: vulnerability and loss of control; threat perception and emotional overwhelm; and emerging control and agency. Early dreams reflected helplessness and heightened threat sensitivity, whereas later dreams increasingly depicted the dream-ego as capable of recognising danger and responding more adaptively. Findings suggest that dream processes may serve as indicators of changes in affect regulation and relational functioning, offering a process-sensitive window into psychotherapeutic change in psychosomatic contexts.

Indexed as

affect regulationcase studydream analysispsychosomatic processesPsychotherapy process

Identifiers

PMID42615088
PMCPMC13551306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.