ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2026
Preliminary findings from a brief psychodynamic counseling program for university staff: users' psychological characteristics and implications for the program's utility.
Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on university staff mental health and intervention evaluation remains limited, especially in Italy. Brief psychodynamic counseling appears promising for reducing distress and improving emotion regulation. The present study aimed to explore the socio-demographic, occupational, and psychological characteristics of university staff members seeking support at a brief psychodynamic counseling service and to examine changes in psychological functioning and distress, symptomatology, and mentalized affectivity following the intervention. Forty-eight participants (mean age=46.16 years, SD=9.57) completed the counseling program, consisting of four weekly clinical sessions followed by a one-month follow-up session. Measures included: the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Brief Mentalized Affectivity Scale (BMAS), and the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales - Self-Report 30 (DMRS-SR-30). Higher use of the counseling service among female staff (69%), with a fairly balanced distribution across employment stages, emerged. The main reason for seeking support was psychological difficulties (46%), while others reported work- or family-related issues. At baseline, 68% showed psychological functioning above the OQ-45 clinical cut-off. Paired-samples t-tests revealed significant reductions in overall psychological functioning, distress, and symptomatology, alongside improvements in the processing dimension of mentalized affectivity. Participants also exhibited a moderate-to-good level of defensive functioning at baseline, indicating relatively adaptive capacities. Preliminary findings suggest that brief psychodynamic counseling may support improvements in functioning and symptomatology among university staff members, together with changes in emotional processing. Integrating defensive functioning and mentalized affectivity may contribute to clarifying the mechanisms of change, although further controlled longitudinal research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.