Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615063›Full record

ArticleWomen's studies international forum2026

Are pads the priority? Contested framings of the Brazilian National Policy on menstrual health and dignity.

Isabela Hümmelgen, Inga T Winkler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's studies international forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabela HümmelgenSJD Candidate, Department of Legal Studies, Central European University, Quellenstr. 51, 1100, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-3999
Inga T WinklerAssociate Professor in Human Rights, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-4387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policymakers and policy advocates in Brazil have adopted various framings for menstrual policymaking, including menstrual precarity, health and dignity. Relying on the concept of framing and applying the "what is the problem represented to be?" approach, we unpack how menstrual needs are represented and how these representations inform and curtail proposed solutions in the Brazilian national policy. We rely on document analysis and interviews with activists and policymakers to present the debates from 2019 to 2024. We find that the Brazilian policy adopted novel and holistic language on health and dignity which is much broader than in other national contexts. Ultimately, however, policy priorities in Brazil mirrored those in other contexts and remain largely limited to distribution of menstrual products. Meanwhile, activists have been actively demanding the implementation of a broader agenda, that includes confronting menstrual stigma, investing in menstrual education, and providing health care services to menstruators, which opens up promising avenues for future policy directions.

Indexed as

FramingMenstrual dignityMenstrual healthMenstrual movementPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID42615063
PMCPMC7619374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.