ArticleKidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
Relationship of Renal Replacement Therapy to Cancer Site: A Hospital-Based Analysis in Osaka, Japan.
Article in Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer patients are at risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) due to anticancer agents, tumor lysis syndrome, sepsis, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with longer hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and significant healthcare resource consumption. Therefore, early detection of severe AKI requiring RRT and the implementation of preventive measures are crucial. We comprehensively evaluated the associations with RRT by cancer site among Japanese cancer patients undergoing treatment through use of Hospital-Based Cancer Registry (HBCR) data linked to administrative data in a multicenter cohort study. Methods: Patients were classified into three groups based on the timing of RRT after the initiation of cancer treatment: acute phase (≤30 days), post-acute phase (after 30 days), and no RRT. The hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs for RRT incidence were evaluated by cancer site (colon, lung, stomach, liver, kidney, esophagus, pancreas, and hematologic malignancies) using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing-risk models adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and diuretic use. The 1-year cumulative incidence of RRT was also calculated. Results: A total of 230,850 patients were analyzed. Among them, 386 patients received RRT at ≤30 days after cancer treatment initiation (acute phase), 479 patients received RRT at >30 days (post-acute phase), and 229,985 patients did not receive RRT. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the HRs for RRT were significantly higher in the acute phase among patients with colorectal cancer (HR: 1.72, Conclusion: The risk of RRT after cancer treatment was increased during the acute phase in patients with colorectal, liver, and kidney cancer and those with hematologic malignancies. Patients with hematologic malignancies always had a higher HR for RRT, but the HR was particularly high in the acute phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.