Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615048›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2026

Surgically Resected Early Anal Gland Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Resemble a Benign Perianal Cyst: A Case Report.

Himawari Kuwahara-Kihara, Shoichi Hazama, Toshiyuki Fujii, Masahiro Kitahara, Shinsuke Kanekiyo, Hiroshi Hashiyada

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Himawari Kuwahara-KiharaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital, Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shoichi HazamaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital, Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Toshiyuki FujiiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital, Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Masahiro KitaharaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital, Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shinsuke KanekiyoKanekiyo Clinic, Hikari, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hiroshi HashiyadaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital, Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdenocarcinoma of anal gland origin is a rare tumor that develops extramurally in the submucosal space and presents with nonspecific symptoms. Consequently, it is difficult to distinguish from benign conditions, such as anal cysts and abscesses, making early diagnosis challenging. Herein, we report a rare case of early-stage mucinous adenocarcinoma with a partially solid mass that appeared to have arisen from the anal glands and was initially diagnosed and treated as a perianal cyst. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented to a local clinic with difficulty in defecation. A palpable mass, thought to be either a perianal cyst or abscess, was identified near the anus and was surgically resected. Histopathological examination revealed glandular tissue with mucinous components, but the lack of epithelial structures precluded a definitive diagnosis. Two years later, the patient developed a cystic lesion in the anus, which gradually enlarged, prompting referral to our department (Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Shunan Memorial Hospital). MRI suggested a cyst, but an attempt to aspirate the contents was unsuccessful. Local resection was performed because a mucinous cystic tumor was suspected. Pathological examination identified the lesion as a mucinous adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong positivity for cytokeratin 7, weak positivity for cytokeratin 20, and negativity for caudal-type homeobox 2, suggesting anal gland origin. The patient did not experience a recurrence during 13 months of follow-up.

conclusionsThis case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing mucinous adenocarcinoma of anal gland origin, which can resemble benign perianal cystic lesions, particularly in the early stage. Malignancy should be considered in recurrent or atypical extramucosal cystic lesions of the anal region, even when clinical and imaging evidence of malignancy is limited. Careful histopathological evaluation, together with clinical and imaging findings, is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment selection.

Indexed as

anal gland adenocarcinomaimmunohistochemistrylocal resectionmucinous adenocarcinomaperianal cyst

Identifiers

PMID42615048
PMCPMC13485457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.