Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615024›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular echography

Usefulness of Bedside Point-of-care Ultrasounds in Intensive Care Unit for Septic Patients: A Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging.

Marco Tescione, Annalisa Piccolo, Eugenio Giuseppe Vadalà, Claudio Franzutti, Domenica Donato, Simone Pantano, Manuela Macheda, Eustachio Agricola, Matteo Cameli, Maurizio Cusmà-Piccione and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Marco TescioneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Annalisa PiccoloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Eugenio Giuseppe VadalàDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Claudio FranzuttiDepartment of Radiology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Domenica DonatoDepartment of Cardio Thoraco Vascular Surgery, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Simone PantanoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Manuela MachedaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Eustachio AgricolaDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo CameliDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Maurizio Cusmà-PiccioneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonio De LucaCardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Roberta ManganaroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giovanna Di GiannuarioDepartment of Emergency, Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiology Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Sebastiano MachedaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "BMM", Reggio di Calabria, Italy.
Concetta ZitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
This Document was Promoted by Members of the 2024–2026 SIECVI Scientific Documents Committee and Reviewed by
Giovanni Di SalvoDepartment of Women and Child Health, Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Cardiology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Scipione CarerjDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giorgio FaganelloDepartment of Cardiology, Udine Hospital, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock remain major causes of morbidity and mortality and are frequently complicated by multiple organ dysfunction, making management particularly challenging for intensivists. Early recognition of hemodynamic instability, prompt identification of the infectious source, and timely interventions are crucial to improve outcomes. Bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a safe, rapid, and noninvasive tool that supports real-time assessment of the septic patient, guiding both diagnosis and treatment. A structured POCUS approach can be used for initial hemodynamic evaluation, detection of infectious foci, and ultrasound (US)-guided therapeutic procedures directly at the bedside. In addition, the relatively low cost and portability of US make it especially valuable in low-resource settings, promoting more standardized and equitable care. This article provides a practical guide to the use of bedside US in patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit, focusing on key views, essential findings, and their implications for clinical management.

Indexed as

Critical careintensive care unitspoint-of-care ultrasoundsepsissepticshock

Identifiers

PMID42615024
PMCPMC13485266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.