Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615009›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

Addition of a second double-row reduces fragment micromotion and increases fixation strength in suture fixation of a bony Bankart injury: A biomechanical study.

Maximilian Hinz, Ayham Jaber, Justin F M Hollenbeck, Rio R Castro, Wyatt H Buchalter, Matthew T Provencher, Peter J Millett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maximilian HinzDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2649-8420
Ayham JaberDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-4950
Justin F M HollenbeckDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1682-0444
Rio R CastroDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5535-9374
Wyatt H BuchalterDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3111-4417
Matthew T ProvencherDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-3415
Peter J MillettDepartment of BioMedical Engineering Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-3746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate micromotion and failure load when the bony Bankart bridge (BBB) is performed with one versus two double-rows. It was hypothesized that the addition of a second double-row would reduce fragment micromotion and increase ultimate failure load. Methods: Seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (age: 48 years [22-65 years], sex: 57.1% male) with bony Bankart lesions, with a defect width of 25% of the glenoid diameter, were tested in the present study. In a paired design, one shoulder underwent the BBB with one double-row, and the contralateral shoulder underwent the BBB with two double-rows. Micromotion of the bony Bankart fragment was tested by cyclic non-physiological point loading (5-20 N at 1 Hz for 50 cycles) using a dynamic tensile machine. Optical markers and a three-dimensional digitizer established fragment and glenoid coordinate systems, enabling precise tracking of translational and rotational displacements of the fragment. This was followed by failure testing, where the fragment was loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Failure load and stiffness were recorded. Results: Under inferior point loading, the repair with one double-row demonstrated significantly greater rotation about the Conclusions: Fixation with two double-rows resulted in a significantly less fragment micromotion and a significantly greater failure strength compared with the BBB using one double-row. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Indexed as

bony Bankart lesionglenoid rim fractureshoulder arthroscopyshoulder dislocationshoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID42615009
PMCPMC13484902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.