ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2026
Psychometric validation of instruments measuring emotional stress and self-esteem in a dental patient population.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming more popular in dental research for measuring various psychological aspects of patients' experiences. However, it is essential to validate these measures' properties based on the setting where they are applied. This study aims to validate the Romanian versions of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) for adult dental patients. Methods: This is a prospective study for psychometric validation of PROMs for adult dental patients conducted at the Department of Preventive Dentistry, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity were assessed for these PROMs. Responsiveness was evaluated based on pre-post comparisons during routine dental visits. Results: The RSES showed high internal consistency reliability for adult dental patients (α = 0.77-0.80), whereas K10 showed excellent internal consistency reliability (α = 0.91). Furthermore, it was found that psychological distress was related to affective pain but not sensory pain, whereas self-esteem was not related to any of these measures. Both instruments showed responsiveness across clinical time points. Conclusions: The Romanian versions of K10 and RSES showed satisfactory psychometric properties for adult dental patients and could potentially be useful for psychosocial research in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.