Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614949›Full record

ReviewMedicine and pharmacy reports2026

Sex differences in axial spondyloarthritis: biological mechanisms, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic implications - a narrative review.

Diana Maria Margareta Moldovan, Clementina López-Medina, Daniela Fodor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana Maria Margareta Moldovan2 Internal Medicine Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Clementina López-MedinaMedical and Surgical Sciences Department, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Daniela Fodor2 Internal Medicine Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are gaining recognition as clinically significant, but they are still not well incorporated into diagnostic practice and outcome assessment. Although long viewed as a predominantly male disease, axSpA affects women at nearly comparable rates and often follows a distinct phenotype. These differences extend beyond variations in severity and appear to reflect different biological and clinical expressions of disease. Women with axSpA typically report higher levels of pain, fatigue, and disease activity, frequently alongside lower inflammatory markers and slower radiographic progression. They also experience longer diagnostic delays and more often present with peripheral manifestations or overlapping pain conditions such as fibromyalgia. In contrast, men more commonly exhibit the classical axial phenotype, elevated C-reactive protein, and greater structural damage. This discordance between symptom burden and objective inflammation creates challenges for disease assessment, as conventional tools may not perform equally across sexes. Emerging evidence also indicates sex-related differences in treatment response and drug persistence. Recognizing sex as a biological determinant of disease expression, rather than merely a covariate for statistical adjustment, offers an opportunity to improve diagnostic precision, refine outcome interpretation, and support more individualized patient care.

Indexed as

axial spondyloarthritisbiologic therapypatient-reported outcomespersonalized medicinesex differences

Identifiers

PMID42614949
PMCPMC13484465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.