Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614934›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

Artemis: Harnessing Knowledge Graphs for Next-Generation Drug Target Prioritization.

Vladimir Yu Kiselev, Edward Ainscow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladimir Yu KiselevAlethio Therapeutics, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1893-2255
Edward AinscowAlethio Therapeutics, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-8422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) have become an important asset in biomedical research and drug discovery by enabling the structured integration of heterogeneous biological knowledge. When combined with machine learning (ML), KGs support the identification of novel drug-target relationships, but existing approaches are often KG-centric, relying primarily on graph structure and embeddings while overlooking disease-specific biological and clinical context. Moreover, many high-impact applications depend on proprietary KG infrastructures, limiting accessibility for the broader research community. Here, we introduce Artemis, a practical and generalizable ML framework for indication-aware target prioritization that integrates public biomedical KGs with clinical evidence from the ChEMBL database. Artemis derives graph-based representations of clinically validated drug targets from multiple publicly available KGs and trains supervised ML models using disease-relevant clinical labels derived from ChEMBL. This hybrid feature space is used to train supervised ML models across 7 disease indications, with performance assessed via cross-validation and guided parameter optimization. The framework is further evaluated on emerging breast cancer targets reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024, demonstrating its ability to prioritize novel candidates. Overall, this work demonstrates that publicly available KGs can be used for actionable, translational target discovery when coupled with clinical data. Artemis provides an accessible, scalable, and cost-efficient alternative to proprietary KG platforms, thereby offering a practical solution for researchers seeking to prioritize therapeutic targets in real-world drug discovery settings.

Identifiers

PMID42614934
PMCPMC13484285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.