Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614911›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Functionally distinct alpha components are differentially modulated by attention and affect behavior.

Gamze Bilgen, Elie Rassi, Alma ElShafei, Julio Rodriguez-Larios, Saskia Haegens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gamze BilgenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5951-3349
Elie RassiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-5373
Alma ElShafeiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-092X
Julio Rodriguez-LariosBrunel University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4014-2973
Saskia HaegensDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-6275

Funding

Scaffolding of brain operations: the role of beta oscillations in forming flexible neural ensemblesR01MH123679 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HAEGENS, SASKIA · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha oscillations (~10 Hz) have been hypothesized to gate information flow in the brain by inhibiting task-irrelevant and disinhibiting task-relevant processing. Recent work using independent component analysis (ICA) showed that functionally distinct alpha components co-exist during a working-memory task. Here, we recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) while participants performed a visual delayed match-to-sample task with pre- and retro-cueing to investigate the gating role of alpha and the impact of top-down attention on these dynamics. Consistent with prior findings, we observed that alpha power temporally tracked the presentation of the informative cue. Using ICA, we replicate previous results regarding the co-existence of two distinct alpha components (Alpha1 and Alpha2), and extend these findings by showing that these alpha components are differentially modulated during the decision delay with opposite relationship to behavioral outcomes. Furthermore, we report on preparatory mechanisms involving Alpha1 and Alpha2 and show that their subsequent impact on task performance varies with cue informativeness and the task relevance of upcoming input. When task relevance was unknown (i.e., in the retro-cue condition), increases in Alpha1 power before task-relevant input were associated with poorer performance. In contrast, when task relevance was known (i.e., in the pre-cue condition), pre-stimulus increases in Alpha2 power before task-irrelevant (i.e., to-be unattended) input was associated with better task performance. Combined, these findings are in line with our hypothesis that Alpha1 rhythms modulate visual processing while Alpha2 rhythms modulate the short-term storage of visual information. Crucially, these distinct (anticipatory) alpha dynamics only became evident using a decomposition approach, emphasizing the necessity of analysis methods that can disentangle overlapping rhythmic dynamics that stem from different sources.

Indexed as

alpha rhythmattentionbrain oscillationsICAMEGworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42614911
PMCPMC13483082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.