ReviewCureus2026
Perioperative Anesthetic Management of Kleine-Levin Syndrome: Current Evidence, Mechanistic Rationale, and a Proposed Practice Framework.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kleine-Levin syndrome is a rare disorder of central hypersomnolence characterized by relapsing-remitting severe sleepiness associated with cognitive impairment, derealization, apathy, behavioral change, and hyperphagia. Direct perioperative evidence remains limited and is insufficient to establish comparative safety, recurrence risk, or a preferred anesthetic technique. Reports with direct perioperative evidence described favorable immediate perioperative courses, but follow-up was heterogeneous, and the uniformly favorable published outcomes are susceptible to substantial publication bias. Most patients return to normal or near-normal function between episodes, although residual sleep, cognitive, behavioral, or autonomic symptoms persist in a subset. The perioperative period introduces factors that may obscure evaluation or disturb sleep-wake stability, including sleep disruption, physiologic stress, perioperative illness, and exposure to sedative and opioid medications. No specific perioperative trial data are available, so this narrative review synthesizes direct disease-specific evidence, mechanistic rationale, and established perioperative practice to propose a conservative, evidence-mapped framework. Disease-informed considerations include elective scheduling during a stable interepisodic period when feasible, documentation of baseline cognitive and behavioral status with collateral history, and treatment of suspected recurrence as a diagnosis of exclusion. Other considerations, including minimizing unnecessary sedatives and long-acting opioids, considering regional, neuraxial, or local techniques and opioid-sparing analgesia, using short-acting titratable agents, and applying anesthetic depth and neuromuscular monitoring, represent established perioperative practices adapted to this population. These considerations are conditional and hypothesis-generating, not formal guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.