ReviewBiomedical reports2026
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology diagnosis and analysis: Technologies, clinical integration, and future prospects (Review).
Review in Biomedical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital pathology is perhaps the most revolutionary leap forward in modern diagnostic medicine. The present review analyzes the existing context of AI pathology systems, particularly diagnostic precision, clinical validation, and technical systems such as convolutional neural networks and transformers and discusses the integration challenge in clinical workflows for these systems. AI systems have achieved pathologist-level performance in controlled settings, including diagnostic accuracy >99% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values exceeding 0.97. However, translating research into clinical adoption is riddled with several challenges attributable to computational requirements, data standardization issues, regulatory hurdles and limitations in generalizability. Moreover, Vision Transformers are widely popular as powerful alternatives to conventional convolutional models, delivering high performance in certain domains while also imposing a novel computational burden. Overcoming these challenges is a prerequisite for the successful integration of AI into pathology practice and the realization of its full diagnostic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.