ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2025
A Physics-Augmented Deep Learning Framework for Classifying Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Data.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GenUnfold: Rapidly Predict Protein Mechanical Unfolding Trajectory via a Physics-Guided Diffusion Model.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering protein folding and unfolding pathways under tension is essential for deepening our understanding of fundamental biological mechanisms. Such insights hold the promise of developing treatments for a range of debilitating and fatal conditions, including muscular disorders like Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) is a powerful technique for investigating forces involved in protein domains folding and unfolding. However, SMFS trials often involve multiple protein molecules, necessitating filtering to isolate measurements from single-molecule trials. Currently, manual visual inspection is the primary method for classifying single-molecule data; a process that is both time-consuming and requires significant expertise. Here, we both apply state-of-the-art machine learning models and present a novel deep learning model tailored to SMFS data. The proposed model employs a dual-branch fusion strategy; one branch integrates the physics of protein molecules, and the other operates independently of physical constraints. This model automates the isolation of single-molecule measurements, significantly enhancing data processing efficiency. To train and validate our approach, we developed a physics-based Monte Carlo engine to simulate force spectroscopy datasets, including trials involving single molecules, multiple molecules, and no molecules. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming five baseline methods on both simulated and experimental datasets. It attains nearly 100% accuracy across all simulated datasets and an average accuracy of 79.6 ± 5.2% on experimental datasets, using only ~30 training samples, surpassing baseline methods by 11.4%. Notably, even without expert annotations on experimental data, the model achieves an average accuracy of 72.0 ± 5.9% when pre-trained on corresponding simulated datasets. With our deep learning approach, the time required to extract meaningful statistics from single-molecule SMFS trials is reduced from a day to under an hour. This work results in SMFS experimental datasets from four important protein molecules crucial to many biological pathways. To support further research, we have made our datasets publicly available and provided a Python-based toolbox (https://github.com/SalapakaLab-SIMBioSys/SMFS-Identification).
Identifiers
42614780PMC13484019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.