ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026
Adverse effects of linezolid in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a scoping review.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Linezolid (LZD) has emerged as a key drug for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) treatment. However, its clinical use is limited by substantial toxicity. This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence on LZD-associated adverse effects (AEs) to support safer and more effective TB management clinical decisions. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases (conducted in October 2024) identified 103 primary studies published between 2005 and 2024 that reported AEs related to LZD use in MDR/XDR-TB. Data on frequency, severity, onset, and management of AEs were extracted and narratively synthesised. Results: Of the 103 included studies, 102 (99%) reported at least one AE. The overall frequency of AEs ranged from 2.8% to 100%. Neurological toxicity was reported in 3.5-91.9% of patients, most commonly presenting as peripheral neuropathy. Haematological toxicity was observed in 1.9-84.6% of participants, mainly reported as anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Gastrointestinal disturbances, metabolic complications, such as lactic acidosis and hyperlactacidaemia, and dermatological events were also reported. Conclusion: LZD-associated toxicity is frequent and often clinically significant, particularly during prolonged treatment. Careful patient assessment, including comorbidities and potential contributing factors such as vitamin deficiencies, along with regular monitoring and, where available, therapeutic drug monitoring, may help optimise safety and treatment outcomes. Future research should focus on standardised toxicity assessment, pharmacokinetic-based dosing strategies, and the inclusion of diverse patient populations to improve the safety and effectiveness of LZD-based regimens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.