Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614749›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2026

Comparative machine learning survival models for under-five mortality in Southern Africa with frailty modelling.

Mafanedza Nephawe, Wende Clarence Safari, Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Justine B Nasejje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mafanedza NephaweSchool of Computer Science & Applied Mathematics, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Wende Clarence SafariInequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Health Research Services and Policy (HSRP), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Pierre-Philippe DechantSchool of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Justine B NasejjeSchool of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Child survival remains central to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 and 10, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa where inequalities in health outcomes persist. This study aimed to predict under-five survival in Southern Africa using advanced machine learning survival models and to examine the influence of household composition, maternal care giving, and unobserved community-level heterogeneity on child mortality outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort was constructed using Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) birth-history data from Malawi, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Survival time was measured from birth until death before age five or censoring at the time of interview, with a maximum follow-up period of 59 months. Three survival modelling approaches were evaluated: Random Survival Forests (RSF), DeepHit, and DeepFrailty. The DeepFrailty model incorporated DHS cluster identifiers to account for unobserved community-level heterogeneity. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and Integrated Brier Score (IBS), while calibration analyses and five-fold cross-validation were used to evaluate predictive reliability and model robustness. Results: Survival probabilities remained consistently high across all four countries, exceeding 0.97 throughout the follow-up period. South Africa generally demonstrated the most favourable survival outcomes and lowest mortality risk, whereas Zambia showed comparatively lower survival probabilities and higher cumulative hazard levels over time. Among the evaluated models, RSF achieved the strongest predictive performance across countries, with C-index values ranging from 0.8890 to 0.9458 and IBS values ranging from 0.0062 to 0.0097. DeepHit demonstrated slightly lower predictive performance (C-index: 0.5889-0.8943; IBS: 0.0085-0.0140), while DeepFrailty produced comparatively lower predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.8385-0.9159; IBS: 0.0164-0.0212). However, DeepFrailty provided clearer separation of survival and cumulative hazard curves across countries by capturing latent community-level heterogeneity through the frailty component. Important predictors of under-five survival included "births in the past year", "total number of living children", "total children ever born", "currently breastfeeding", and "birth order", highlighting the importance of household composition, fertility behaviour, and maternal caregiving practices in child survival. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning survival models for improving under-five mortality prediction and risk stratification in Southern Africa. RSF emerged as the most accurate and robust predictive model, while DeepFrailty provided valuable insights into unobserved socioeconomic and community-level heterogeneity influencing child survival. The results further emphasise the importance of targeted, context-specific interventions focusing on maternal healthcare, family planning, breastfeeding promotion, and household-level support to improve child survival outcomes. Future work should focus on improving the interpretability of deep learning survival models and incorporating additional contextual information to support evidence-based public health interventions aligned with SDGs 3 and 10.

Indexed as

Child survivalClustersDeepFrailtyDeepHitDemographic health surveyRandom survival forestVariable importance

Identifiers

PMID42614749
PMCPMC13482215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.