ArticleOxford open digital health2026
Transforming perinatal health with AI-predictive models in precision and digital innovations for maternal and fetal well-being: a systematic review.
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and wearable monitoring devices is revolutionizing the management of high-risk pregnancies, offering unprecedented opportunities for early detection, personalized care, and improved outcomes. These technologies address critical challenges in maternal and fetal health, especially in resource-limited settings, by enabling proactive and continuous care. This systematic review specifically focuses on the integration of artificial intelligence and wearable devices for managing high-risk pregnancies and highlights regulatory and ethical challenges. Databases like PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science were explored for pertinent studies (from 2015 to 2024). Articles were chosen based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and essential data including technology type, AI algorithms employed, and their influence on perinatal care were collected. The Risk of Bias in the studies was evaluated utilizing standard assessment tools such as PROBAST+AI, and study quality was assessed with TRIPOD+AI. Ultimately, the findings were examined through narrative analysis, leading to the identification of challenges and future research directions. This systematic review examined 16 studies focusing on the application of AI and digital innovations in maternal and fetal healthcare. The studies investigated various AI techniques, including machine-learning models for predicting risks to maternal health, deep learning for monitoring fetal well-being, and wearable sensor technologies for remote health tracking. Many studies produced encouraging outcomes, with AI models reaching high levels of accuracy in early detection, risk assessment, and real-time patient monitoring. However, issues such as dataset biases, generalizability, and ethical concerns continue to pose significant challenges. Additional research is necessary to validate these AI-driven methods across diverse populations to ensure equitable and effective healthcare outcomes. The integration of technologies has the potential to significantly improve the management of high-risk pregnancies. However, a critical regulatory gap exists that must be addressed to ensure that these technologies are used ethically, safely, and effectively. This will involve the development of new regulatory frameworks, a focus on transparency and accountability, and a commitment to addressing bias and data security to provide the best care possible. AI has the potential to transform maternity services by improving risk prediction, enabling remote monitoring, and supporting clinical decisions. However, realizing this potential requires addressing limitations related to data quality, algorithm accuracy, user privacy, and ethical considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.