Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614687›Full record

ReviewHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Early childhood caries: Exploring the ethical implications for dental neglect in South Africa.

Nashna Rampersad, Nadia Mohamed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nashna RampersadDepartment of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3601-5428
Nadia MohamedDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-2648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental neglect is defined as the 'wilful' failure of a parent and/or guardian to provide optimal oral healthcare, leading to pain and infection. Child abuse and neglect, including dental neglect, are significant public health issues with long-term consequences for victims. Aim: Given the early childhood caries (ECC) prevalence and socio-economic circumstances of South Africa's (SA) population, the aim of this review is to explore whether ECC constitutes child neglect in SA. Method: This study explored existing literature on ECC prevalence in SA and its association with dental neglect. It examined SA's child protection policies and considered the socio-economic context contributing to dental neglect. Results: Evidence suggests that dental neglect, including untreated caries, may indicate broader neglect. However, SA's historical injustices, poverty, unemployment and lack of access to quality healthcare and education have resulted in high economic disparity among its population, perpetuating ill-health. Early childhood caries in SA is a broader social problem shaped by political, social and economic forces. Societal neglect shifts focus away from parents and towards examination of harmful government policies and actions which impose constraints on families, leading to diseases such as ECC. Conclusion: Child safety, optimum healthcare and prevention of neglect should be priorities of SA's health and government systems as the country works towards universal health coverage and health system reform. Contribution: This study raises awareness about dental neglect as a child health issue, addresses the root causes of ECC within a societal context, advocates for policy changes and aligns with national and global health priorities.

Indexed as

child oral healthdental neglectearly childhood cariesoral health advocacy

Identifiers

PMID42614687
PMCPMC13482070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.