ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Safety of Long-Acting Intravitreal Hydrogels: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure and Retinal Integrity across Rabbit and Non-Human Primate Models.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injectable hydrogels have emerged as promising platforms for sustained drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye, with the potential to reduce treatment burden and improve patient adherence in chronic disease management. Although numerous preclinical studies report favorable biocompatibility and biodegradability, the effects of intravitreal (IVT) hydrogels on the ocular environment have yet to be comprehensively evaluated. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of preclinical investigations evaluating IVT, drug-loaded hydrogels in rabbit and nonhuman primate models. Primary safety end points included longitudinal changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and total retinal thickness (TRT). Across all included studies, no significant or sustained elevations in IOP were observed relative to baseline or untreated controls. TRT remained stable for 14 days up to two months postadministration, with no evidence of clinically meaningful thinning, degeneration, or retinal toxicity. These outcomes were consistent across diverse hydrogel compositions, therapeutic payloads, gelation mechanisms, and animal models, indicating a broadly favorable intraocular safety profile. Collectively, this analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the ocular safety of IVT hydrogel-based drug delivery systems based on IOP and TRT measurements in preclinical models. These findings reinforce the translational potential of injectable hydrogels as biocompatible, long-acting alternatives to conventional IVT injection-based therapies and support their continued development for intraocular applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.