ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Undergraduate nursing students' post-coronavirus disease 2019 academic learning experiences at a public university in South Africa: A qualitative study.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted nursing education globally, affecting theoretical instruction, clinical training and students' well-being. Aim: To explore and describe undergraduate nursing students' academic learning experiences in the post-COVID-19 period at a South African public university. Setting: A public university in South Africa. Methods: A qualitative, exploratory-descriptive, and contextual design underpinned by Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory was applied. Twenty-nine purposively selected undergraduate nursing students participated in four face-to-face semi-structured focus group discussions facilitated by an independent fieldworker. Data were thematically analysed by an independent coder. Results: Three themes emerged. Firstly, students reported persistent challenges following the return to in-person learning, including misalignment between teaching and assessment methods, gaps in clinical exposure, and heightened mental health strain. Secondly, enablers of academic success were identified, such as self-directed learning, peer support, and personal and professional development. Thirdly, participants suggested improvements to post-pandemic learning, including curriculum reform, more flexible timetabling, and safer, better-resourced clinical placements. Conclusion: The post-pandemic academic environment continues to shape nursing students' learning and well-being. While students demonstrated resilience through self-regulation and peer collaboration, institutional reforms remain essential to foster academic success and professional readiness. Contribution: The study provides context-specific insights into post-pandemic nursing education in South Africa and highlights the importance of responsive, student-centred strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.