ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Implementing quality in hospitals - stakeholders' roles: A qualitative social network analysis.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current experience of the implementation of quality standards policy in South Africa has sometimes produced negative results because of insufficient understanding of policy goals, resource constraints, and a lack of consultation and involvement of the key actors. Understanding how the actors operate in the health establishments will assist stakeholders in improving compliance. Aim: This study aimed to examine the roles of actors responsible for the implementation of the six key performance areas of the National Core Standards (NCS) in the better- and least-performing hospitals in Gauteng. Setting: This study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Gauteng province. Methods: A qualitative social network analysis (SNA) using Net-Map was conducted with purposively selected staff to identify key actors, relationships and influence in implementing the NCS. Participants mapped actors using coloured nodes, arrows and influence towers. Data, including direct quotes, were collected through guided sessions and transcribed, revealing power dynamics and communication flows within two Gauteng tertiary hospitals. Results: Social network analysis revealed that one of the hospitals had a collaborative network with active chief executive officer (CEO) involvement, while another hospital followed a more hierarchical structure. Both were bounded networks with quality managers as key actors. Informal relationships enhanced coordination and compliance. Actor influence, connectivity and leadership engagement were critical in implementing the NCS, highlighting SNA's value in diagnosing organisational strategy and performance gaps. Conclusion: Leadership support and shared interest with all other actors responsible for policy implementation are essential if the healthcare establishment is to comply with NCS. Contribution: Social network analysis can reveal bottlenecks, identify influential individuals and inform strategies for enhancing organisational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.