ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2026
Differences of Physical Functions and Gait Kinematics in Selection of Strategies for Increasing Gait Speed in Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the differences among strategies for improving gait speed, gait kinematics, and physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This study included 383 community-dwelling older adults. Spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters during preferred and fast walking were measured using inertial measurement units. Participants were classified into three groups based on the differences in step length and time between preferred and fast walking: time group (primarily decreasing step time), length group (primarily increasing step length), and intermediate group (intermediate strategies between time and length groups). The five-times sit-to-stand test was performed to assess lower-limb function. Two-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare physical functions and gait parameters between groups (time, intermediate, and length groups) and walking conditions (preferred and fast). Results: No significant interaction effect of group and sex was found for strategies for increasing gait speed (P = 0.875). The length group showed lower preferred and fast walking speeds (P <0.001) and longer sit-to-stand time (P = 0.006) than the time group. The length group also showed smaller trailing limb angle (defined by the location of the ankle joint relative to the hip joint in the sagittal plane) and smaller ankle plantar flexion angle at the pre-swing phase during preferred walking than the time group (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Strategies for increasing gait speed differed depending on lower-limb function and gait kinematics during preferred walking. These findings provide direction for the implementation of tailored gait interventions to prevent a decline in gait speed in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.