ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Outlier detection of skill decision differences of football penalty takers from a data-driven perspective: multialgorit hm modeling and empirical research of eye-tracking data.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defensive performance in football penalty kicks relies heavily on a goalkeeper's visual anticipation and rapid decision-making capabilities. While identifying the visual search advantages of expert athletes is crucial for optimizing training, conventional eye-tracking metrics often fail to capture the complex spatial distribution patterns of gaze points. Integrating machine learning anomaly detection algorithms offers a novel methodological perspective for the precise quantification and analysis of visual strategy variations across different expertise levels. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in visual search characteristics between expert and amateur football players during penalty defense tasks, leveraging eye-tracking technology and multiple machine learning algorithms. Methods: Gaze data were collected from 10 professional/semi-professional athletes (Expert Group) and 10 collegiate athletes (Amateur Group), resulting in 120 valid records. The Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that the gaze point coordinates ( Results: (1) DBSCAN results revealed a highly significant difference in outlier rates between the two groups Conclusion: Expert athletes exhibit more concentrated and stable visual search strategies (characterized by lower gaze outlier rates) during penalty defense compared to amateurs. The DBSCAN algorithm and composite indicators effectively quantify expertise-related visual search features, providing empirical evidence for understanding cognitive patterns and enhancing scientific training for football goalkeepers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.