Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Outlier detection of skill decision differences of football penalty takers from a data-driven perspective: multialgorit hm modeling and empirical research of eye-tracking data.

Zheng Li, Pu Hu, Hua Liu, Ruo Chen Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zheng LiWuhan Sports University, School of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pu HuWuhan Sports University, School of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hua LiuWuhan Sports University, School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ruo Chen DaiWuhan Sports, University Football Academy, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defensive performance in football penalty kicks relies heavily on a goalkeeper's visual anticipation and rapid decision-making capabilities. While identifying the visual search advantages of expert athletes is crucial for optimizing training, conventional eye-tracking metrics often fail to capture the complex spatial distribution patterns of gaze points. Integrating machine learning anomaly detection algorithms offers a novel methodological perspective for the precise quantification and analysis of visual strategy variations across different expertise levels. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in visual search characteristics between expert and amateur football players during penalty defense tasks, leveraging eye-tracking technology and multiple machine learning algorithms. Methods: Gaze data were collected from 10 professional/semi-professional athletes (Expert Group) and 10 collegiate athletes (Amateur Group), resulting in 120 valid records. The Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that the gaze point coordinates ( Results: (1) DBSCAN results revealed a highly significant difference in outlier rates between the two groups Conclusion: Expert athletes exhibit more concentrated and stable visual search strategies (characterized by lower gaze outlier rates) during penalty defense compared to amateurs. The DBSCAN algorithm and composite indicators effectively quantify expertise-related visual search features, providing empirical evidence for understanding cognitive patterns and enhancing scientific training for football goalkeepers.

Indexed as

DBSCAN clusteringexpert-novice paradigmeye movement trackingmachine learningoutlier detectionpenalty taker

Identifiers

PMID42614545
PMCPMC13481837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.