Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614540›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Emerging quantitative CCTA imaging biomarkers for cardiovascular risk stratification: a narrative review.

Ruben Mora, Kyvan Irannejad, Nia Abbas, Phanidhar Mogga, Beshoy Iskander, Logan Hubbard, Sion Roy, Suvasini Lakshmanan, Matthew Budoff, Srikanth Krishnan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruben MoraHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Kyvan IrannejadHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Nia AbbasHarbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States.
Phanidhar MoggaHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Beshoy IskanderHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Logan HubbardUCLA Radiology, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sion RoyHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Suvasini LakshmananHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Matthew BudoffHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.
Srikanth KrishnanHarbor-UCLA Medical Center and The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved beyond anatomical stenosis assessment into a comprehensive platform for cardiovascular and cardiometabolic risk stratification. Advances in postprocessing and artificial intelligence now enable automated quantification of multiple imaging biomarkers from a single acquisition, including coronary plaque characteristics, CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT), and hepatic steatosis. Purpose: In this narrative review, we synthesize current imaging biomarkers, evaluate their individual and combined prognostic value, and propose a conceptual multimarker framework for cardiovascular risk stratification-recognizing that several domains remain investigational and are not yet ready for routine, biomarker-guided management. Key findings: Quantitative plaque analysis identifies high-risk features - including low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, and napkin-ring sign - that independently predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) beyond stenosis severity. FFR-CT carries a Class 2a guideline recommendation for intermediate lesions and demonstrates superior vessel-level diagnostic accuracy compared with SPECT and comparable performance to PET in head-to-head trials. EAT volume and density independently predict incident coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and all-cause mortality across large prospective cohorts. Pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) reflects local coronary inflammation, independently predicts MACE after adjustment for conventional risk factors and coronary calcium, and decreases in response to high-dose statin therapy. Hepatic steatosis, identifiable from the same noncontrast acquisition used for calcium scoring, is associated with a 64% increased odds of cardiovascular events in a meta-analysis exceeding 34,000 adults and predicts both plaque progression and high-risk plaque features in longitudinal registries. Emerging multimarker models combining these domains demonstrate incremental discriminatory value beyond individual imaging biomarkers or traditional clinical risk scores. Conclusion: CCTA provides a pragmatic, multidimensional framework that integrates anatomic, functional, inflammatory, and metabolic information from a single noninvasive examination. While standardization, longitudinal validation, and equitable representation in research cohorts remain unresolved challenges, ongoing advances in AI-driven image analysis and multiomics integration may, if validated in prospective outcome studies, support the future translation of quantitative CCTA imaging biomarkers into more personalized cardiovascular care.

Indexed as

cardiac CT angiographycardiometabolic riskepicardial adipose tissueFFR-CThepatic steatosisimaging biomarkerspericoronary fat attenuation indexquantitative plaque

Identifiers

PMID42614540
PMCPMC13482244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.