ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effects of sourdough and yeast fermented breads consumption on glycaemia in healthy populations: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bread is a vital source of energy and is widely consumed in human diets. As a carbohydrate-rich food, it is often considered to impair glycaemic homeostasis; however, clinical and molecular evidence suggest that its effects may vary depending on the characteristics of bread consumed. In particular, sourdough-fermented bread has been proposed to exert potentially beneficial effects on glycaemia via shifts in metabolites in the food matrix, as well as chemical and physical changes that occur during fermentation. However, evidence from human interventional studies on this topic is inconsistent due to differing experimental designs, heterogeneous populations, or a focus on sourdough fermentation that does not consider the effects of yeast fermentation. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence for a positive effect of fermented bread consumption on glycaemia and insulinaemia in healthy adults. To this end, we conducted a systematic review to identify and analyze relevant human studies, complemented by a characterization of the breads investigated and a discussion of possible mechanisms of action, following the EFSA dossier framework. We identified 27 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Taking into account the risk of bias in these studies, the consistency of the reported effects, and the biological plausibility based on food characteristics and potential mechanisms of action, we conclude that the available evidence for a beneficial effect of sourdough compared to yeast-fermented bread on glycaemic and insulinaemic homeostasis in healthy individuals is neither sufficient nor convincing. For the general effect of fermentation on glycaemic and insulinaemic homeostasis in healthy individuals, evidence is considered very low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.