Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Will neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy complicate subsequent surgery compared with adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy?

Zhoujunyi Tian, Haoshuai Yang, Jin Zhang, Zhenrong Zhang, Chaoyang Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhoujunyi TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haoshuai YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhenrong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chaoyang LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has significantly improved pathological response rates in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it increases surgical complexity compared with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy remains clinically debated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 121 NSCLC patients (81 neoadjuvant; 40 adjuvant) treated between 2021 and 2024. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline imbalances. Surgical difficulty was quantified using a standardized 10-point scoring system. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to identify independent risk factors for high-difficulty procedures (score >5). Results: IPTW successfully achieved balance across all baseline covariates. The neoadjuvant group exhibited significantly higher technical complexity than the adjuvant group (39.8% vs. 2.7% high difficulty; Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with greater technical surgical difficulty and higher conversion rates compared with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Despite these technical challenges, surgical resection remains safe and feasible, though it requires specialized thoracic expertise to manage complex anatomical alterations effectively.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyinverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancersurgical difficulty

Identifiers

PMID42614499
PMCPMC13481775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.