ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Foundations for pediatric vocal biomarkers: age-aware phoneme recognition and latent-space error analysis.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pediatric speech sound disorders (SSDs) affect many young children and are commonly assessed through auditory-perceptual judgments and IPA transcription, which are limited by listener bias, variable interrater reliability, and difficulty attributing deviations at the phoneme level. We present a developmentally informed framework for pediatric vocal biomarker foundations that prioritizes age-aware, phoneme-resolved interpretability over utterance-level accuracy alone. Methods: Using a CAAP-derived subset of the SEED corpus (27-94 months) with clinically specified phoneme targets and SSD labels, we construct age-stratified phoneme profiles and quantify error structure via phoneme error rate (PER) and age-banded confusion signatures. We operationalize co-articulation as transition dynamics from MFCC trajectories and their first and second derivatives, reflecting the velocity and acceleration of spectral change across adjacent segments. We learn compact acoustic representations with a variational autoencoder (VAE) and model temporal evolution with BiLSTMs, including attention, to characterize disorder-relevant instability in latent trajectories. For phoneme transcription, we train BiLSTM-CTC sequence models on clinically elicited speech and evaluate disorder classification and phoneme substitution patterns within age groups, then stress-test generalization on ECSC "Frog Story" narratives from TalkBank/CHILDES. Results: Co-articulation transition magnitudes varied systematically by age and clinical group. Attention improved temporal classification specifically in younger children, and PER dropped markedly between ages 3-4 and 4-5. On long-form naturalistic narratives, CTC training and inference remained numerically stable, but greedy decoding produced degenerate output dominated by blank and repetition tokens. Discussion: Together, these results support an age-aware approach to pediatric phoneme analytics, in which articulatory coordination, not just phoneme identity, carries developmentally and clinically relevant information; and phoneme-level performance should be interpreted relative to developmental stage rather than a single fixed benchmark. The decoding failures on naturalistic speech indicate a bottleneck specific to decoding rather than to the underlying representations, motivating constrained, hierarchical, or duration-aware decoding as a tractable next step. These findings position age-stratified, phoneme-resolved analysis as a foundation for interpretable and scalable pediatric screening and biomarker development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.