Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614494›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Journey mapping paediatric oncology care in Saudi Arabia: A mixed-methods study.

Febe V Lacson, Dorien Wentzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Febe V LacsonDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6953-9652
Dorien WentzelDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-8952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Because of the global increase in childhood cancer, patient journey mapping was utilised to improve the treatment experiences and outcomes for paediatric oncology patients and their families. Aim: The aim of this study is to describe the process of developing a patient journey map for paediatric oncology care and to present insights from families' experiences across different stages of the care pathway. Setting: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which provides oncology services for paediatric patients with malignant disorders. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was utilised. Quantitative data were collected from 134 family members using the Press Ganey Inpatient Survey. Data were analysed using SPSS 103 version 27. Nine family members were interviewed, data were analysed using manifest content analysis. The results were integrated to develop a descriptive care map. To refine the journey map, a modified Delphi method was applied. The initial design was shared with a Delphi panel comprising senior paediatric oncology staff and consensus was achieved. Results: A survey of 134 questionnaires revealed a 77% response rate. Qualitative insights from the nine interviews revealed six key themes: care from nurses, care from physicians, positive experience, negative experience, improvement in care and feelings summarising the journey. Conclusion: The study provided valuable information of patients' families' satisfaction with the experiences throughout the oncology units and simultaneously highlighted areas for improvement. Contribution: This study visualises a patient's care journey through a complex system, allowing healthcare providers to fill gaps in care processes.

Indexed as

family experiencesjourney mappingmixed methodspaediatric oncologySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42614494
PMCPMC13482050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.