Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Electromyographic responses of the auriculomotor system during effortful listening in hearing aid users.

Andreas Schroeer, Tanja Biehl, Matthias Latzel, Stefan Launer, Daniel J Strauss, Farah I Corona-Strauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas SchroeerSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Tanja BiehlSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Matthias LatzelSonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
Stefan LaunerSonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
Daniel J StraussSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Farah I Corona-StraussSystems Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University & htw saar, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Auricular muscles in humans may still display increased activity associated with auditory attention and effortful listening in complex patterns. As research into this auriculomotor system has primarily been conducted in normal-hearing participants, this study investigated electromyographic (EMG) signals of auricular muscles in hearing aid users under challenging listening conditions in order to evaluate their potential future use as a measure of perceived listening effort. Methods: Twenty-four experienced, bilateral hearing aid users (mean age approximately 64 years) were instructed to attend a target podcast, which was either presented in quiet (SIQ), or in front of a spatially distributed, noisy background. If noise was present, a specialized noise reduction feature of the hearing aids was either turned off (NR-off) or on (NR-on), which resulted in three task difficulties, or conditions: SIQ, NR-on, and NR-off. EMGs of two auricular muscles, the superior and posterior auricular muscles (SAM, PAM), as well as the corrugator supercilii (part of the facial muscles) were recorded. Results: Perceived listening effort significantly increased from SIQ to NR-on to NR-off, indicating that these three conditions presented distinct task difficulties. PAM activity resembled the perceived listening effort (highest activity during NR-off, intermediate during NR-on, lowest during SIQ), but statistical significance was only observed between NR-off and SIQ ( Conclusions: This preliminary study shows that, in a group of hearing aid users, the activity of auricular muscles increased in highly demanding listening tasks, but due to an unexpected time drift, replication of the study with a modified protocol and a larger participant group is necessary.

Indexed as

auricular muscleseffortful listeningEMG (electromyography)hearing aidsnoise reductionobjective measuresposterior auricular musclesuperior auricular muscle

Identifiers

PMID42614462
PMCPMC13481888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.