ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Findings From Electronic Medical Record Review of 2500 Patients Identified With Lyme Disease Diagnoses, Test Orders, and Antibiotic Orders in the SubLyme Network.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records provide opportunities for improving Lyme disease surveillance by collecting detailed clinical information and timely, scalable disease incidence estimation. Medical record review can improve understanding of clinical manifestations, how likely and possible cases compare, and potential misclassification of possible cases. Methods: The SubLyme Network is a collaboration among 5 healthcare systems, a coordinating center, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The sites each conducted stratified random sampling of 500 potential acute Lyme disease episodes for medical record review from patients with a diagnosis, test order, and/or appropriate antibiotic in 2022 or 2023. Reviewers abstracted data, including from free text notes, to classify patients as likely or possible Lyme disease and by clinical manifestation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify differences between possible compared to likely Lyme disease cases. Results: Among 2500 reviews, 880 patients were categorized as having likely or possible new onset, active Lyme disease. The patient proportion identified as having a specific clinical manifestation ranged from 61% to 76% across sites. Of likely and possible cases, 55.9%, 7.8%, 1.3%, and 3.1% were diagnosed with erythema migrans, Lyme arthritis, Lyme carditis, and neuroborreliosis, respectively. Possible cases differed from likely cases in having more nonspecific symptoms, non-Lyme disease diagnoses, provider uncertainty, and undocumented provider decision-making. Conclusions: Medical record review is expected to be more accurate than computable phenotypes for Lyme disease identification and staging, yet likely and possible cases were challenging to distinguish, and a sizable proportion could not have clinical manifestation assigned. Findings provide direction for computable phenotype refinement to improve case identification. KEY WORDS: clinical manifestations, electronic health records, epidemiology, Lyme disease, surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.